You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a question about the arrival prediction of the port.
For ships with the ship id of "0x0b98f267e96f76f14e1525a40df0274066124eb5", it will travel to BARCELONA -> unknown port -> MONACO -> LIVORNO. (Inside the port radius)
In this case, all depart ports are BARCELONA.
I knew that we decided to split this trip. But it did not actually separate.
I am confused that the depart port does not change when entering a port radius of unknown port, MONACO, or LIVORNO.
First, what is the prediction for BARCELONA -> unknown port?
When going from unknown port to MONACO, is the arrival port predicted by MONACO?
Or is LIVORNO the correct prediction?
Could you explain more about this algorithm?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
Sorry for a long response.
Tuple groupings into trips, as well as trips splitting was done in terms of labelling (reflected in fields tripId, ARRIVAL_CALC, ARRIVAL_PORT_CALC only). This had no impact on the original data (incl. the Departure Port field) sent to the systems.
I have a question about the arrival prediction of the port.
For ships with the ship id of "0x0b98f267e96f76f14e1525a40df0274066124eb5", it will travel to BARCELONA -> unknown port -> MONACO -> LIVORNO. (Inside the port radius)
In this case, all depart ports are BARCELONA.
I knew that we decided to split this trip. But it did not actually separate.
I am confused that the depart port does not change when entering a port radius of unknown port, MONACO, or LIVORNO.
Or is LIVORNO the correct prediction?
Could you explain more about this algorithm?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: