Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implemented improved setitem semantics #264

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 3, 2019
Merged

Implemented improved setitem semantics #264

merged 2 commits into from Mar 3, 2019

Conversation

philippjfr
Copy link
Member

@philippjfr philippjfr commented Mar 3, 2019

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

@codecov-io codecov-io commented Mar 3, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #264 into master will increase coverage by 0.36%.
The diff coverage is 99.04%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #264      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.81%   89.17%   +0.36%     
==========================================
  Files          34       34              
  Lines        5336     5523     +187     
==========================================
+ Hits         4739     4925     +186     
- Misses        597      598       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
panel/tests/test_layout.py 99.47% <100%> (+0.31%) ⬆️
panel/layout.py 95.2% <96.82%> (+0.44%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c92e2b7...f6f1878. Read the comment docs.

@philippjfr philippjfr merged commit 069c599 into master Mar 3, 2019
3 checks passed
@philippjfr philippjfr deleted the layout_setitem branch Mar 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants