Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't return coroutine in DLNA/DMR service handler #32011

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 20, 2020
Merged

Conversation

@tsvi
Copy link
Contributor

tsvi commented Feb 20, 2020

Fixes #32010

Breaking change

Proposed change

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Example entry for configuration.yaml:

# Example configuration.yaml

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #32010
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

The integration reached or maintains the following Integration Quality Scale:

  • No score or internal
  • 馃 Silver
  • 馃 Gold
  • 馃弳 Platinum
Fixes #32010
@codecov

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 20, 2020

Codecov Report

鉂楋笍 No coverage uploaded for pull request base (dev@832337f). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             dev   #32011   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage       ?   94.69%           
======================================
  Files          ?      766           
  Lines          ?    55578           
  Branches       ?        0           
======================================
  Hits           ?    52630           
  Misses         ?     2948           
  Partials       ?        0

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
螖 = absolute <relative> (impact), 酶 = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 832337f...3bf236e. Read the comment docs.

@balloob balloob added this to the 0.106.0 milestone Feb 20, 2020
@balloob balloob merged commit b6d60c3 into home-assistant:dev Feb 20, 2020
11 checks passed
11 checks passed
CI Build #20200220.15 succeeded
Details
CI (FullCheck Mypy) FullCheck Mypy succeeded
Details
CI (FullCheck Pylint) FullCheck Pylint succeeded
Details
CI (Overview CheckFormat) Overview CheckFormat succeeded
Details
CI (Overview Lint) Overview Lint succeeded
Details
CI (Overview Validate) Overview Validate succeeded
Details
CI (Tests PyTest Python37) Tests PyTest Python37 succeeded
Details
cla-bot Everyone involved has signed the CLA
codecov/patch Coverage not affected when comparing 828d197...3bf236e
Details
codecov/project Absolute coverage decreased by -0.01, only covered lines were removed
Details
docs-missing Documentation ok.
Dev automation moved this from Needs review to Done Feb 20, 2020
@balloob

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

balloob commented Feb 20, 2020

Thanks !

balloob added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2020
@lock lock bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 21, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
Dev
  
Done
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
You can鈥檛 perform that action at this time.