Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for homekit controller sensors #21535

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 28, 2019

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@cpopp
Copy link
Contributor

commented Feb 28, 2019

Adds support for homekit devices with temperature, humidity, and
light level characteristics

Description:

Related issue (if applicable): fixes #

Pull request in home-assistant.io with documentation (if applicable): home-assistant/home-assistant.io#8781

Example entry for configuration.yaml (if applicable):

Usage is exactly the same as before.

Checklist:

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass with tox. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • New dependencies have been added to the REQUIREMENTS variable (example).
  • New dependencies are only imported inside functions that use them (example).
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt by running script/gen_requirements_all.py.
  • New files were added to .coveragerc.

If the code does not interact with devices:

  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.
Add support for homekit controller sensors
Adds support for homekit devices with temperature, humidity, and
light level characteristics (such as the iHome iSS50)

@balloob balloob merged commit 84b8455 into home-assistant:dev Feb 28, 2019

4 checks passed

Hound No violations found. Woof!
cla-bot Everyone involved has signed the CLA
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
coverage/coveralls Coverage remained the same at 92.751%
Details

@ghost ghost removed the in progress label Feb 28, 2019

@balloob balloob referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2019

Merged

0.90.0 #22216

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.