Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HPCC-17995 Document ESDL version and default_client_version attributes #10288

Conversation

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@JamesDeFabia
Copy link
Contributor

commented Jul 25, 2017

Signed-off-by: Jim DeFabia jamesdefabia@lexisnexis.com

@mayx Please review

Type of change:

  • This change is a bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • This change is a new feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • This change improves the code (refactor or other change that does not change the functionality)
  • This change fixes warnings (the fix does not alter the functionality or the generated code)
  • This change is a breaking change (fix or feature that will cause existing behavior to change).
  • This change alters the query API (existing queries will have to be recompiled)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
    • My code does not create any new warnings from compiler, build system, or lint.
  • The commit message is properly formatted and free of typos.
    • The commit message title makes sense in a changelog, by itself.
    • The commit is signed.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
    • I have updated the documentation accordingly, or...
    • I have created a JIRA ticket to update the documentation.
    • Any new interfaces or exported functions are appropriately commented.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTORS document.
  • The change has been fully tested:
    • I have added tests to cover my changes.
    • All new and existing tests passed.
    • I have checked that this change does not introduce memory leaks.
    • I have used Valgrind or similar tools to check for potential issues.
  • I have given due consideration to all of the following potential concerns:
    • Scalability
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Thread-safety
    • Premature optimization
    • Existing deployed queries will not be broken
    • This change fixes the problem, not just the symptom
    • The target branch of this pull request is appropriate for such a change.
  • There are no similar instances of the same problem that should be addressed
    • I have addressed them here
    • I have raised JIRA issues to address them separately
  • This is a user interface / front-end modification
    • I have tested my changes in multiple modern browsers
    • The component(s) render as expected

Testing:

@hpcc-jirabot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Jul 25, 2017

Jim DeFabia
HPCC-17995 Document ESDL version and default_client_version attributes
Signed-off-by: Jim DeFabia <jamesdefabia@lexisnexis.com>

@JamesDeFabia JamesDeFabia force-pushed the JamesDeFabia:HPCC-17995ESDLversion branch from 5ed03d7 to 871099e Jul 26, 2017

@mayx

mayx approved these changes Jul 26, 2017

Copy link
Member

left a comment

@JamesDeFabia looks good.

@HPCCSmoketest

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Jul 26, 2017

Automated Smoketest:
Sha: 871099e
Build: success
Build: success
ECL Watch: Rebuilding Site

errors warnings build time
0 65 94.675 seconds

Install hpccsystems-platform-community_6.4.0-rc6.el7.x86_64.rpm
HPCC Start: OK

Unit tests result:

Test total passed failed errors timeout
unittest 95 95 0 0 0
wutoolTest(Dali) 19 19 0 0 0
wutoolTest(Cassandra) 19 19 0 0 0

Regression test result:

phase total pass fail
setup (hthor) 11 11 0
setup (thor) 11 11 0
setup (roxie) 11 11 0
test (hthor) 733 733 0
test (thor) 627 627 0
test (roxie) 760 760 0

HPCC Stop: OK
HPCC Uninstall: OK

@richardkchapman richardkchapman merged commit 91fd0eb into hpcc-systems:candidate-6.4.0 Jul 27, 2017

@JamesDeFabia JamesDeFabia deleted the JamesDeFabia:HPCC-17995ESDLversion branch Aug 1, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.