Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HPCC-18308 eclcmd should pass eclcc options as debug values #10443

Merged

Conversation

afishbeck
Copy link
Member

@afishbeck afishbeck commented Sep 21, 2017

"ecl run -f-"

Allows arbitrary eclcc options to be passed to the eclcc command line.
Those options should also be passed as workunit debug values formatted
as "eclcc-".

Signed-off-by: Anthony Fishbeck anthony.fishbeck@lexisnexis.com

Type of change:

  • This change is a bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • This change is a new feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • This change improves the code (refactor or other change that does not change the functionality)
  • This change fixes warnings (the fix does not alter the functionality or the generated code)
  • This change is a breaking change (fix or feature that will cause existing behavior to change).
  • This change alters the query API (existing queries will have to be recompiled)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
    • My code does not create any new warnings from compiler, build system, or lint.
  • The commit message is properly formatted and free of typos.
    • The commit message title makes sense in a changelog, by itself.
    • The commit is signed.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
    • I have updated the documentation accordingly, or...
    • I have created a JIRA ticket to update the documentation.
    • Any new interfaces or exported functions are appropriately commented.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTORS document.
  • The change has been fully tested:
    • I have added tests to cover my changes.
    • All new and existing tests passed.
    • I have checked that this change does not introduce memory leaks.
    • I have used Valgrind or similar tools to check for potential issues.
  • I have given due consideration to all of the following potential concerns:
    • Scalability
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Thread-safety
    • Premature optimization
    • Existing deployed queries will not be broken
    • This change fixes the problem, not just the symptom
    • The target branch of this pull request is appropriate for such a change.
  • There are no similar instances of the same problem that should be addressed
    • I have addressed them here
    • I have raised JIRA issues to address them separately
  • This is a user interface / front-end modification
    • I have tested my changes in multiple modern browsers
    • The component(s) render as expected

Testing:

@hpcc-jirabot
Copy link

@richardkchapman
Copy link
Member

@ghalliday Please sanity check this

@@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ bool doDeploy(EclCmdWithEclTarget &cmd, IClientWsWorkunits *client, const char *
expandDefintionsAsDebugValues(cmd.definitions, cmd.debugValues);
if (cmd.debugValues.length())
{
IArrayOf<IEspNamedValue> debugValues;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

trivial: not used.

@@ -254,7 +254,8 @@ class EclccCompileThread : implements IPooledThread, implements IErrorReporter,
{
//Allow eclcc-xx-<n> so that multiple values can be passed through for the same named debug symbol
const char * start = option + (*option=='-' ? 1 : 6);
const char * dash = strrchr(start, '-'); // position of second dash, if present
const char * finger = (*start=='-') ? start+1 : start; //support leading double dash
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand this change - can you elaborate?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ghalliday It's slightly confusing, but the key is that when the option is appended to the eclcc command line the stripped '-' is restored. I was trying not to refactor the code more than I had to as this is a last minute PR.

eclccCmd.appendf(" -%s=%s", optName.get(), value);

Some eclcc options actually have two dashes. "--nostdinc" for example. So this change preserves the second dash in the option name "-nostdinc" and then both dashes end up on the command line.

@ghalliday
Copy link
Member

ghalliday commented Sep 25, 2017

@afishbeck I may be misunderstanding, but it looks like an option -f-x is converted to eclcc-x, but would then be matched in eclccserver as option x. I would have expected it to be converted to eclcc--x (then the double minus code would make sense.)

"ecl run <target> <file> -f-<option>"

Allows arbitrary eclcc options to be passed to the eclcc command line.
Those options should also be passed as workunit debug values formatted
as "eclcc-<option>".

Signed-off-by: Anthony Fishbeck <anthony.fishbeck@lexisnexis.com>
@afishbeck
Copy link
Member Author

@ghalliday Removed unused variable. Responded to your other comment.

@HPCCSmoketest
Copy link
Contributor

Automated Smoketest: ✅
Sha: 8e3fb66
Build: success
Build: success
ECL Watch: Rebuilding Site

errors warnings build time
0 65 92.332 seconds

Install hpccsystems-platform-community_6.4.2-rc3.el7.x86_64.rpm
HPCC Start: OK

Unit tests result:

Test total passed failed errors timeout
unittest 96 96 0 0 0
wutoolTest(Dali) 19 19 0 0 0
wutoolTest(Cassandra) 19 19 0 0 0

Regression test result:

phase total pass fail
setup (hthor) 11 11 0
setup (thor) 11 11 0
setup (roxie) 11 11 0
test (hthor) 733 733 0
test (thor) 627 627 0
test (roxie) 760 760 0

HPCC Stop: OK
HPCC Uninstall: OK

@ghalliday
Copy link
Member

@richardkchapman looks good. I'll let you decide which build it goes in.

@richardkchapman
Copy link
Member

I have a concern that --fastparse and --nostdinc should be being applied to the creation of the archive when ecl command calls out to a local eclcc, but don't necessarily apply to the parsing at the remote end - so while it's ok to fix the -f- processing as you have here, we really need --fastparse and --nostdinc to be also handled explicitly by all ecl commands.

I also suspect we may need to push this out to 6.4.4. There is a workaround of creating the archive independently I think.

@afishbeck
Copy link
Member Author

@richardkchapman I could easily add those as explicit eclcmd options.

My guess would have been that --nostdinc had no effect on the backend since the depencies were already gathered into the archive at the client side?

I can't seem to find --fastparse.

@afishbeck
Copy link
Member Author

As mentioned in the meeting, --fastparse was a typo, it's --fastsyntax.

@richardkchapman richardkchapman changed the base branch from candidate-6.4.2 to candidate-6.4.4 September 29, 2017 08:35
@richardkchapman richardkchapman changed the base branch from candidate-6.4.4 to candidate-6.4.6 October 26, 2017 08:11
@richardkchapman richardkchapman merged commit 6f64155 into hpcc-systems:candidate-6.4.6 Oct 26, 2017
@afishbeck afishbeck deleted the eclccDebugValueOptions branch November 7, 2017 14:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
5 participants