New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HPCC-14586 Support HINT on COUNT() and DATASET([]) #7991
HPCC-14586 Support HINT on COUNT() and DATASET([]) #7991
Conversation
https://track.hpccsystems.com/browse/HPCC-14586 |
Automated Smoketest Build: success |
2a75b27
to
9326c04
Compare
Automated Smoketest Build: success |
@jamienoss please review |
ForEachChild(i2, expr) | ||
{ | ||
IHqlExpression * cur = expr->queryChild(i2); | ||
if (cur->isAttribute()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it ok/intended to include the keyed attribute even though this is already/also included in valueArgs? Not sure if the only point to this loop is to ensure all attributes are preserved where they were ignored from valueArgs or...?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it is desired. Ideally keyed would not be added to the valueArgs, but that would require more substantial changes elsewhere.
@ghalliday back to you. |
@richardkchapman please review |
and merge if happy. |
Signed-off-by: Gavin Halliday <gavin.halliday@lexisnexis.com>
Automated Smoketest Build: success |
HPCC-14586 Support HINT on COUNT() and DATASET([]) Reviewed-By: Richard Chapman <rchapman@hpccsystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Gavin Halliday gavin.halliday@lexisnexis.com