Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix name of sparsehash easyconfigs #1452

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Mar 6, 2015
Merged

fix name of sparsehash easyconfigs #1452

merged 6 commits into from Mar 6, 2015

Conversation

boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Mar 6, 2015

From https://code.google.com/p/sparsehash/:

31 January 2012
I've just released sparsehash 2.0.

The google-sparsehash project has been renamed to sparsehash.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/2496/
Test FAILed.

@boegel boegel changed the title fix name of google-sparsehash easyconfig fix name of sparsehash easyconfigs Mar 6, 2015
boegel added a commit to boegel/easybuild-easyconfigs that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2015
@boegel
include easybuilders#1452 in release notes
e788170
@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/2499/
Test FAILed.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/2501/
Test FAILed.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/2503/
Test FAILed.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/2504/
Test PASSed.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 6, 2015

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/06262d5043beaebc3892 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 6, 2015

Just fixing a naming screwup, nothing much to review, and it all still works, go going in...

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2015
@boegel
Merge pull request #1452 from boegel/fix_sparsehash_name
eb05dd7 
fix name of sparsehash easyconfigs
@boegel boegel merged commit eb05dd7 into easybuilders:develop Mar 6, 2015
@boegel boegel deleted the fix_sparsehash_name branch March 6, 2015 19:05
wpoely86 added a commit to wpoely86/easybuild-easyconfigs that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2015
@wpoely86
Merge branch 'develop' into gnuplot5
6717d0a 
* develop: (294 commits)
  bump vsc-base dep for v2.0.4
  bump version to v2.1.0dev
  bump version to v1.16.2.0, update release notes
  add easyconfig file for EasyBuild v2.0.0
  add easyconfig file for EasyBuild v1.16.2
  minor fixes in release notes
  fix filenames for sparsehash easyconfigs
  fix 'sources' spec in sparsehash easyconfigs
  fix name of sparsehash dep in ABySS easyconfig
  include easybuilders#1452 in release notes
  actually, the correct name is 'sparsehash'...
  fix name in google-sparsehash easyconfig
  fix moduleclass in HPCBIOS easyconfigs
  bump to v2.0.0 + update release notes
  fix name of google-sparsehash easyconfig
  use new 'bundle' moduleclass for bundles
  Added libxml as build dep to Clang
  removed 2.2.30
  cleanup
  added BLAST+ folder
  ...
@boegel boegel mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2016
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@boegel @hpcugentbot