[Question] How to use tidy for multiple files?

[Kristinita]

1. Briefly

I don't find, how I can modify multiple files in multiple folders use HTML Tidy.

2. Structure

Example site structure:

output
    SashaTest
        SashaTest.html
    TidyTest
        TidyTest.html

In real project I have more than 100 HTML files.

3. Expected behavior

Modifying SashaTest.html and TidyTest.html files.

It works for me for single files:

D:\SashaPelicanTest>tidy -mq "output/TidyTest/TidyTest.html"
line 12 column 16 - Warning: trimming empty <span>

4. Actual behavior

I can't use glob patterns, examples:

D:\SashaPelicanTest>tidy -mq "output/**/*.html"
Error: Can't open "output/**/*.html"

D:\SashaPelicanTest>tidy -mq *.html
Error: Can't open "*.html"

5. Did not help

I use Grunt for building my site. grunt-htmltidy support multiple files, but plugin works with bugs and, possibly, no longer maintained, see #6.

Thanks.

[geoffmcl]

@Kristinita you are correct console tidy does not support glob patterns, but as tidy -h points out tidy does support multiple input html files on the command line -

tidy [options...] [file...] [options...] [file...]

But that would be a very long command line if you have more than 100 files... and in Windows there may be some limit of the maximum command line... but should work...

Alternatively, since you appear to be in windows, why not write a batch file, using for %%i in (*.html) do tidy -mq %%i. Running for /? will show the syntax...

Or you could make a list file of all html files, like dir /s /b output\*.html > templist.txt...

Then again use a batch file with like for /F %%i in (templist.txt) do tidy -mq %%i...

May need to add double quotes if the file path or names includes spaces...

There are just so many options using batch files...

And a word of warning, while I have considerable confidence in tidy, be aware the -m, modify option will overwrite the existing file with the tidied version and there is no going back if tidy changes something you do not want changed, or makes a change you do not like... you should make a backup of ALL files first...

And such a batch file system could even copy the original to a safe place first...

Also note you can set HTML_TIDY=d:\path\tidy-def.conf in the environment, and tidy will use this config file for each file processed...

HTH...

[Kristinita]

@geoffmcl , thanks for the answer.

Batch file — is Windows-specific solution, not compatible for UNIX users.

Is it cross-platform solution, for Windows and UNIX both?

Thanks.

[balthisar]

This isn't really a Unix or DOS support site, but try man for in Unix to learn how to do things multiple times in POSIX environments. The Unix philosophy favors composability as opposed to monolithic design, meaning that your shell provides tools such as for, xargs, and others that can address these needs. It would be highly inappropriate for Tidy to support "globs" directly.

[geoffmcl]

@Kristinita yes, my answer suggested using batch files since the example you gave D:\SashaPelicanTest>tidy -mq *.html indicated windows usage...

Had it been in unix, the normal unix shell will already expand a command like $ tidy -mq *.html to a list of files matching the glob, if any exist in the current directory... and/or using shell scripting...

The important issue is that console tidy has no built-in ability to expand globs, and as @balthisar points out would be "inappropriate for Tidy to support globs directly"... that must be done outside tidy...

As mentioned it does accept multiple files on its command line... $ tidy [options] path/file1.html path/file2.html another/path/file3.html ... and so on...

HTH...

[geoffmcl]

20201123: @Kristinita seems question asked, and answered, so closing this...

Please provide further feedback if there is still some outstanding question... thanks...

[placoderm]

For anyone else who is trying to do this, ChatGPT gave me this to work on Windows Command Prompt:

@echo off
setlocal enabledelayedexpansion

set "tidy_command=tidy --tidy-mark 0 -m"

for %%f in (*.html) do (
    echo Processing file: %%f
    !tidy_command! "%%f"
)

endlocal

I improved it by adding --quiet yes That stops all the verbiage about improving Tidy, etc.