Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RFC 7233: improve description of 206 response #102

Closed
reschke opened this issue Jun 22, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

RFC 7233: improve description of 206 response #102

reschke opened this issue Jun 22, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
editorial erratum semantics

Comments

@reschke
Copy link
Contributor

reschke commented Jun 22, 2018

See https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4358
@reschke
Copy link
Contributor Author

reschke commented Jun 22, 2018

Mailing list discussion: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015AprJun/0426.html

FWIW, the editorial change I would suggest here would be to end the
sentence after "one or more parts of the selected representation".
The trailing " that correspond to the satisfiable ranges found in the
request's Range header field (Section 3.1)" is irrelevant to the response
(and is specified elsewhere).

....Roy

reschke added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 25, 2018
@reschke
Merge pull request #105 from httpwg/reschke-eid438
d3d1749 
improve description of 206 response (closes #102)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
editorial erratum semantics
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@reschke