Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RFC 7230: ABNF for http(s) URIs contains fragment #103

Closed
reschke opened this issue Jun 22, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

RFC 7230: ABNF for http(s) URIs contains fragment #103

reschke opened this issue Jun 22, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
erratum semantics

Comments

@reschke
Copy link
Contributor

reschke commented Jun 22, 2018

See https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4251 and https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4252
@reschke
Copy link
Contributor Author

reschke commented Jun 25, 2018

Mailing list thread: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/gZVRtgOUFyzOk68FgL1jHTzWG2s

@reschke
Copy link
Contributor Author

reschke commented Jun 25, 2018 •
edited

HTTPBIS issue that introduced the fragment identifiers into the ABNF: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/httpbis/ticket/451

HTTPBIS issue that added prose about fragment identifier: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/httpbis/ticket/531

@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented Oct 10, 2018

Seems reasonable, although some people who refer to the ABNF might be surprised. Can we add a paragraph directly below each ABNF rule that points out that fragments are allowed, giving some examples?

@reschke
Copy link
Contributor Author

reschke commented Oct 10, 2018

See pull request in #106

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
erratum semantics
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mnot @reschke