Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Warning #139

Closed
mnot opened this issue Oct 9, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Warning #139

mnot opened this issue Oct 9, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented Oct 9, 2018

Isn't implemented, generated, used or surfaced to users; can we deprecate?

@mnot mnot added the caching label Oct 9, 2018
@mnot mnot added the discuss label Oct 9, 2018
@mnot
Copy link
Member Author

mnot commented Oct 10, 2018

Proposal:

@mnot mnot added has-proposal and removed discuss labels Oct 10, 2018
@royfielding
Copy link
Member

+1, with big notes in the Changes section.

@sordina
Copy link

sordina commented Aug 20, 2021

Just curious if anyone has any background, what would be a good alternative to the Warning header for cache limit warnings?

@royfielding
Copy link
Member

Just curious if anyone has any background, what would be a good alternative to the Warning header for cache limit warnings?

This isn't a good place for general discussion. You might want to ask the mailing list, though I am not aware of any cache limit warnings within HTTP because they are only relevant to the cache admin (who typically has an email or phone number stored for such notifications).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants