Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bring RFC2818 into semantics #236

Closed
mnot opened this issue Aug 20, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #249
Closed

Bring RFC2818 into semantics #236

mnot opened this issue Aug 20, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #249
Labels
has-proposal semantics

Comments

@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented Aug 20, 2019

As discussed in #194.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
has-proposal semantics
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Bring RFC2818 into semantics (Mnot 236) httpwg/http-core
1 participant
@mnot