Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consistent IANA registration tables #506

Closed
reschke opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

consistent IANA registration tables #506

reschke opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@reschke
Copy link
Contributor

reschke commented Oct 30, 2020

In Semantics, we have now moved most registration tables back into the IANA considerations sections.

Should we do the same for everything else, @mnot, @royfielding ?

@royfielding
Copy link
Member

I don't think so, unless a table serves no other purpose than registration. I left the others in the main spec section because they look to be useful there (as content), but I didn't check carefully.

A good test is to remove the table and read the remaining content to see if it is still sufficient to define the values. If so, then the table can go in the IANA section. If not, then we either need the table inside the section as definition (or we need to replace it with other definitional prose).

@royfielding
Copy link
Member

Yep, all good to move.

@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented Nov 20, 2020

OK, with me, but note that there are two instances of "directives defined below" in the text preceding the cache table that will need to be adjusted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants