We discussed this on the editors' call. Host's semantics aren't specific to HTTP/1.1, even if its requirements are different in other protocol versions. That's why we moved it to Semantics; it's not version-specific (and really very few headers should be).
Closing; if you feel it needs more discussion please request re-opening and we'll do so.
Thank you for the consideration. While I do understand the argument that the semantics of the header field is not version specific, the use is. I've opened a PR that tries to clarify that.
Recently I noticed that the host header field is being discussed in section 6.2.1 of the semantics draft.
I believe that we should
as the "host" header is specific to HTTP/1.1 (except for handling of broken HTTP/2 clients)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: