Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IIUC httpbis-semantics changes the field name registry, thus obsoleting updating BCP 90 / RFC3684.
Is that correct? Should httpbis-semantics mention that?
@reschke
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
"obsoletes": no, because BCP 90 is also for email. "updates": yes, I think so. @mnot?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Hm; I suppose so, given that it's taking some of 3684's turf away.
note that we are updating RFC 3864 (for #515)
1e5b6b6
Now does that make SEMANTICS part of BCP90?
I'm inclined to say no -- it modifies the scope of BCP90 to exclude HTTP header fields. Worth discussing more broadly, though.
Merge pull request #516 from httpwg/reschke-515
b15fbf1
No branches or pull requests
Question
IIUC httpbis-semantics changes the field name registry, thus
obsoletingupdating BCP 90 / RFC3684.Is that correct?
Should httpbis-semantics mention that?
@reschke
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: