Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unused references in semantics? #830

Closed
tfpauly opened this issue Apr 2, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Unused references in semantics? #830

tfpauly opened this issue Apr 2, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@tfpauly
Copy link

@tfpauly tfpauly commented Apr 2, 2021

== Unused Reference: 'RFC2145' is defined on line 9325, but no explicit
reference was found in the text

== Unused Reference: 'RFC7617' is defined on line 9470, but no explicit
reference was found in the text

@reschke
Copy link
Contributor

@reschke reschke commented Apr 3, 2021

RFC 7617 is mentioned in Section 11.1, so this is idnits misreporting.
RFC 2145 is mentioned in the Acks.

@reschke reschke self-assigned this Apr 6, 2021
@reschke
Copy link
Contributor

@reschke reschke commented Apr 6, 2021

I believe we can close this with no action.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants