We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The text in the document says:
Future media types are discouraged from registering any parameter named "q".
The Media Type Designated Experts' suggested to make that stronger, and have the following note on the IANA registry itself:
Future media types are prohibited from registering any parameter named "q".
Let's agree on either "discouraged" or "prohibited", and align the text in the document and in the IANA registry note.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I believe what the IANA registry says is good, so what's left to do is to align our spec text with that.
My understanding is that no new text in the IANA Considerations is needed, as the change to the registry already happened.
Sorry, something went wrong.
If we agree to add the reference to this RFC in the IANA note, once the RFC is published, I can ask IANA to do that.
Good point. We could add that to the IANA Considerations. Should I?
I think that would make sense. Let's hear from others.
0df196d
Merge pull request #971 from httpwg/reschke-970
d898b71
align text about "q" parameter with recent changes to IANA media types registry (closes #970)
reschke
No branches or pull requests
The text in the document says:
The Media Type Designated Experts' suggested to make that stronger, and have the following note on the IANA registry itself:
Let's agree on either "discouraged" or "prohibited", and align the text in the document and in the IANA registry note.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: