Skip to content

Issues: httpwg/http-extensions

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
31 Open 148 Closed
31 Open 148 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Add changes from RFC 6265 section 6265bis
#2810 opened Jun 25, 2024 by sbingler Loading…
1
1
Add multiple cookie header tolerance suggestions & length limit warnings 6265bis
#2804 opened Jun 12, 2024 by sbingler Loading…
2
17
6265bis: suggested Cookie: header maximum/minimum length? 6265bis
#2797 opened Jun 7, 2024 by bagder
1
@sbingler
1
6265bis: what is tolerance to multiple cookies? 6265bis
#2796 opened Jun 5, 2024 by LPardue
1
@sbingler
5
[RFC6265bis WGLC] Lax-allowing-unsafe narrative 6265bis samesite RFC6265bis's `SameSite` cookie attribute. 6265bis
#2791 opened May 30, 2024 by bc-pi
@sbingler
5
Re-implement same-site redirect chain consideration 6265bis defer
#2751 opened Mar 7, 2024 by sbingler
@sbingler
Consider standardizing 7-day max-age cap for cookies set via JavaScript 6265bis defer
#2632 opened Sep 19, 2023 by arichiv
Max-Age / Expires on Cookiebis 6265bis defer
#2531 opened May 8, 2023 by Jxck
Update terminology once whatwg/html#8463 is fixed 6265bis defer
#2502 opened Apr 5, 2023 by sbingler
@sbingler
Changes from RFC6265 6265bis
#2352 opened Dec 22, 2022 by mnot
1
@sbingler
5
[WIP] RFC6265bis: "Lax-Allowing-Unsafe" applies to cross-site redirect 6265bis
#2351 opened Dec 15, 2022 by sbingler • Draft
RFC6265bis: should __ as a prefix be reserved? 6265bis defer
#2264 opened Oct 6, 2022 by bagder
@sbingler
6
internal whitespace in cookie names and values 6265bis defer
#2262 opened Oct 6, 2022 by bagder
@sbingler
13
[rfc6265bis] nameless cookies, client/server inconsistencies 6265bis defer
#2229 opened Aug 8, 2022 by lavish
2
Cookie layering 6265bis defer
#2084 opened Apr 29, 2022 by annevk
2
RFC6265bis: Attributes should specify how missing/invalid values should be handled 6265bis defer
#2046 opened Mar 28, 2022 by sbingler
2
Parser for Domain attributes 6265bis defer
#1939 opened Feb 7, 2022 by annevk
@sbingler
11
Fix #1399 - Add a grammar corresponding to the parsing algorithm 6265bis
#1759 opened Oct 19, 2021 by recvfrom Loading…
29
RFC6265bis: Update 'Storage Model' to include more character set restrictions / processing 6265bis defer
#1593 opened Aug 6, 2021 by recvfrom
@recvfrom
4
Force cookie scope to host, secure, or none 6265bis defer
#1549 opened Jun 15, 2021 by enygren
2
RFC 6265bis: possibility of taking the port into account for "schemeful-cookies" (aka same-origin cookies) 6265bis defer
#1526 opened Jun 1, 2021 by randomstuff
4
RFC 6265bis: Set-Cookie parsing algorithm should enforce more of the syntax requirements 6265bis defer editorial
#1399 opened Feb 4, 2021 by chlily1
@recvfrom
8
RFC6265bis does not specify what happens to existing cookies when the Public Suffix List changes 6265bis defer
#1385 opened Jan 26, 2021 by chlily1
1
6265bis doesn't have an opinion on localhost cookies 6265bis defer
#1289 opened Oct 14, 2020 by sbingler
4
[rfc6265bis] Cookie parser - UTF-8 chars 6265bis defer
#1073 opened Feb 24, 2020 by bakulf
20
ProTip! Type g i on any issue or pull request to go back to the issue listing page.