Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RFC6265bis, Editorial] Typo'd a section number. #1047

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2020
Merged

Conversation

mikewest
Copy link
Member

@mikewest mikewest commented Feb 5, 2020

Closes #1046.

@mikewest
Copy link
Member Author

mikewest commented Feb 5, 2020

@johnwilander I'm just going to land this (as it's trivial), and roll an -05 today.

@mikewest mikewest merged commit b55d1e7 into master Feb 5, 2020
@mikewest mikewest deleted the same-site-section branch February 5, 2020 08:26
@reschke
Copy link
Contributor

reschke commented Feb 5, 2020

This should use a named section reference, no? Otherwise it can break again when section numbers change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bad link in 6265bis samesite enforcement section
2 participants