-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
Remove prefix for RFC (??) & Improve docs #197
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Thanks, @xxchan. We have a |
@Folyd Fair enough. I found First, it's under the "Commands system" section. The difference between prefix and command seems unclear. Second, it says |
Yes, commands also support search via keywords. The docs are outdated, do you mind fixing it BTW? 😅
Normally, the sigil is suitable for high-frequency search, otherwise, let's make it a command. |
.. And I also felt confused how to see the full list since there's only a few rows. Now I just came across the paging feature while browsing the doc. I think it can be put to a more noticable place instead of the end of the doc 🤣 |
Yes I can help improve the docs |
Another thing is that the doc itself is a little bit hard to find too. I was always trying looking for a doc button at the upper-right corner, and couldn't notice the "explore more" at the bottom and didn't know I can scroll down the page.. |
I thought I tried my best to tell the user how to use the extension, but the reality is (😅): |
That would be great. Thanks ❤️ |
Any idea on how to improve it? |
Some possible ideas:
|
Good idea. 👍 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks. However, extension/search/rfc.js
should be deleted.
Search from RFC index, instead of CanIUse index.