-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 392
docs(secrets-engines): Add database secrets engine docs #1036
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1036 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 84.99% 85.00%
=======================================
Files 65 65
Lines 3133 3135 +2
=======================================
+ Hits 2663 2665 +2
Misses 470 470 |
Hi @amiewei , welcome! Thank you for putting up this much-needed documentation for the database secrets engine. I'll take a closer look at the content itself as soon as I can. In the meantime, it seems there are a lot of changes to the poetry configuration in here that we're not quite ready to make yet. Would you be able to revert the changes to Thanks! |
69c02c9
to
302fcd0
Compare
heyhey, thanks for looking at this quickly :) I tried reverting the poetry.lock and pyproject.toml files by essentially deleting those two files locally, then copying the poetry.lock from upstream and reinstalling the packages to auto-regenerate the pyproject.toml. Looking at the diff, I think there are still some differences comparing the auto-generated toml file from the original one. im not well versed in poetry - pun intended, so let me know if this is ok or if there's a better way to revert it 😅. Regardless, i updated the commit based on the above |
😆 neither am I, either kind
Do you know why the file is being auto-generated at all for this change? Are there some commands you're running locally? I figured if you did |
alright i used your command thank you and updated the commit.. 3rd time is the charm? 😅 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, finally had a chance to look at this more closely. It's really great! All my suggested changes are really minor.
For sentence-ending punctuations on descriptions, I used colon :
because one of yours had it already, but I'd also be fine with making them all period/full-stop .
instead.
If you like the suggestions as-is and want to commit from the GitHub UI, use the Files tab in the PR to look at them, that way you can click "Add suggestion to batch" and then commit all the ones you want at once.
Also fine to make changes locally and push them up.
Also if you're ok me pushing these changes, I can take care of that for you and get this merged in. |
Co-authored-by: Brian Scholer <1260690+briantist@users.noreply.github.com>
looks good! thanks for going through it :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great! Thanks so much for improving the documentation. I think you've seen this already but we're looking for help in the project and these improvements are a huge help, hope to see you around with more changes!
Add docs for the database secrets engine - #453
I've added docs/code examples for the majority of methods but missing the static role related methods. I plan on adding them at a later time once I test them.