test: fixed tests without component props. #443
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
hwakabh
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
web-frontend/src/components/FooterContent.vue (1)
Line range hint
13-19: Remove unused code and stylesThere's some cleanup needed:
- The commented out copyright paragraph can be removed if it's no longer needed
- The
.copyrightstyle block is unused since the related element has been removedApply this diff to clean up:
- <!-- <p class="copyright">(c) 2024 hwakabh All Right Reserved.</p> --> </template> -<style scoped> -.copyright { - text-align: center; -} -</style>web-frontend/tests/FooterContent.test.js (3)
5-5: Fix test suite name to match component nameThe test suite name "FooterComponent.vue" doesn't match the actual component name "FooterContent.vue".
-describe("component: FooterComponent.vue", () => { +describe("component: FooterContent.vue", () => {
6-8: Remove unnecessary async functionThe test doesn't contain any asynchronous operations, so the async function is not needed.
- test("Component name should be correct", async () => { + test("Component name should be correct", () => {
12-15: Remove commented-out codeSince the PR objective is to fix tests without component props, the commented-out props code should be removed to maintain clean and focused tests.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
web-frontend/src/components/FooterContent.vue(1 hunks)web-frontend/tests/FooterContent.test.js(1 hunks)web-frontend/tests/HelloWorld.test.js(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- web-frontend/tests/HelloWorld.test.js
🔇 Additional comments (5)
web-frontend/src/components/FooterContent.vue (3)
9-10: LGTM! Improved HTML semantics
The updated structure using <ul> and <li> elements is more semantic and accessible.
1-4: Clarify the purpose of empty props definition
The empty props definition with the comment about vitest seems unnecessary if no props are actually being used. If this is specifically needed for testing, consider:
- Adding more detailed documentation explaining why this is required
- Removing it if not actually needed for component functionality
Let's verify if any tests are actually using the __name prop:
✅ Verification successful
Empty props definition is required for __name test functionality
The empty props definition with defineProps({}) is actually necessary as the component is being tested for its __name property in web-frontend/tests/FooterContent.test.js. The test explicitly checks if the component name matches "FooterContent" using FooterContent.__name. Consider updating the comment to be more specific:
// defineProps required for component to expose __name property used in tests
const props = defineProps({});🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files using __name with this component
rg -l "FooterContent.*__name" tests/
Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find test files related to FooterContent
fd -e spec.js -e test.js -e spec.ts -e test.ts
# Then search for __name usage in any test files
rg "__name" --type=js --type=ts --type=vue
Length of output: 223
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the FooterContent test file
cat web-frontend/tests/FooterContent.test.js
# Also search for __name in all files (without type filtering)
rg "__name"
Length of output: 963
Line range hint 1-19: Verify test migration completeness
Since this PR involves moving tests from HelloWorld.vue to FooterContent.vue, let's ensure all test cases have been properly migrated.
✅ Verification successful
Test migration appears complete and properly implemented
The verification shows that:
- No HelloWorld test references remain in the codebase
- FooterContent tests are properly implemented in
web-frontend/tests/FooterContent.test.js - The test file includes appropriate component mounting and text content verification
- The component is correctly integrated in App.vue
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining HelloWorld test references
echo "Checking for remaining HelloWorld test references..."
rg -l "HelloWorld" tests/
# Verify FooterContent test implementation
echo "Verifying FooterContent test implementation..."
rg -l "FooterContent.*test" tests/
Length of output: 374
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first locate the test files directory
echo "Searching for test files..."
fd -t f "test|spec" -e js -e ts -e vue
# Check for any remaining HelloWorld references in the entire codebase
echo "Checking for HelloWorld references..."
rg -l "HelloWorld"
# Look for FooterContent references
echo "Checking for FooterContent references..."
rg -l "FooterContent"
Length of output: 522
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of the FooterContent test file
echo "Content of FooterContent test file:"
cat web-frontend/tests/FooterContent.test.js
# Let's also check the App.vue usage to understand the component integration
echo -e "\nFooterContent usage in App.vue:"
rg -A 5 -B 5 "FooterContent" web-frontend/src/App.vue
Length of output: 1359
web-frontend/tests/FooterContent.test.js (2)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are well-structured
The imports include all necessary dependencies for component testing with Vitest and Vue Test Utils.
1-18: Verify CI build success with these changes
Since this PR aims to fix failing vitest commands in the Build CI (issue #442), please ensure that:
- All other component tests follow the same pattern of not using props
- The Build CI passes with these changes
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if there are any other test files in the web-frontend/tests directory to ensure we have a complete picture.
Changes are consistent with component implementation
The verification shows that:
- FooterContent.test.js is the only test file in web-frontend/tests/
- The FooterContent component doesn't use any actual props (empty defineProps({}))
- The commented-out props test code can be safely removed as it's not needed
The test changes align perfectly with the component implementation and should resolve the CI issues since there are no other test files that need similar updates.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining prop usage in other test files
rg -l "props:" web-frontend/tests/
Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all test files in web-frontend/tests
fd . web-frontend/tests/ -e test.js
# Check the actual implementation of FooterContent.vue to see if it expects props
cat web-frontend/src/components/FooterContent.vue
Length of output: 568
| test("Component can accept value as props and render as HTML", async () => { | ||
| const expected = "© Untitled. All rights reserved.Design: HTML5 UP"; | ||
| const wrapper = shallowMount(FooterContent) | ||
| // // if compoenents has props | ||
| // const wrapper = shallowMount(FooterContent, { props: { | ||
| // msg: "Hi, there!" | ||
| // }}); | ||
| expect(wrapper.text()).toContain(expected); | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve test readability and accuracy
Several improvements can be made to this test:
- Remove unnecessary async
- Fix spacing in expected text
- Consider testing the actual HTML structure instead of just text content
- test("Component can accept value as props and render as HTML", async () => {
- const expected = "© Untitled. All rights reserved.Design: HTML5 UP";
+ test("Component renders footer content correctly", () => {
+ const expected = "© Untitled. All rights reserved. Design: HTML5 UP";
const wrapper = shallowMount(FooterContent)
- // // if compoenents has props
- // const wrapper = shallowMount(FooterContent, { props: {
- // msg: "Hi, there!"
- // }});
- expect(wrapper.text()).toContain(expected);
+ expect(wrapper.text()).toBe(expected);
+ // Consider adding structure verification
+ expect(wrapper.find('footer').exists()).toBe(true);
})📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| test("Component can accept value as props and render as HTML", async () => { | |
| const expected = "© Untitled. All rights reserved.Design: HTML5 UP"; | |
| const wrapper = shallowMount(FooterContent) | |
| // // if compoenents has props | |
| // const wrapper = shallowMount(FooterContent, { props: { | |
| // msg: "Hi, there!" | |
| // }}); | |
| expect(wrapper.text()).toContain(expected); | |
| }) | |
| test("Component renders footer content correctly", () => { | |
| const expected = "© Untitled. All rights reserved. Design: HTML5 UP"; | |
| const wrapper = shallowMount(FooterContent) | |
| expect(wrapper.text()).toBe(expected); | |
| // Consider adding structure verification | |
| expect(wrapper.find('footer').exists()).toBe(true); | |
| }) |
Issue/PR link
closes: #442
What does this PR do?
Describe what changes you make in your branch:
HelloWorld.vuetoFooterContent.vueshallowMount()without any props(Optional) Additional Contexts
Describe additional information for reviewers (i.e. What does not included)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
<script setup>block in the Footer component for improved compatibility.Bug Fixes
Chores