-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
docs: updated latest implementations. #495
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@hwakabh has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
30-30: Consider adding context about tool usage.Good additions of GitHub Apps and CodeQL to the motivations list. However, it would be helpful to briefly explain how these tools are being utilized in the project.
Consider adding brief descriptions, for example:
- - GitHub Actions & GitHub Apps + - GitHub Actions & GitHub Apps (CI/CD pipelines and repository automation) - - CodeQL + - CodeQL (automated security scanning and code analysis)Also applies to: 35-35
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)
8-10: LGTM! Improved formatting enhances readability.The addition of line continuation characters and splitting the technology stack into separate lines makes the architecture section more readable and maintainable.
Issue/PR link
N/A
What does this PR do?
Describe what changes you make in your branch:
(Optional) Additional Contexts
Describe additional information for reviewers (i.e. What does not included)
N/A
Summary by CodeRabbit