We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hello, I experimented with your code, on running the example dataset of caGrQc for link prediction task. I could only achieve
gen:0.5659075224292616 dis:0.7060041407867494
with the default configuration. However, your paper reported much higher accuracy values, can you explain why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, please try fine-tuning the hyper parameters, especially the n_epochs, lr and update_ratio
Sorry, something went wrong.
请问,可以给一些fine-tuning的建议吗?通过调参,没有方向的话很难实现论文中的最终0.849的结果,甚至accuracy无法稳定提升
No branches or pull requests
Hello, I experimented with your code, on running the example dataset of caGrQc for link prediction task. I could only achieve
with the default configuration.
However, your paper reported much higher accuracy values, can you explain why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: