Support exception method in loggers

[leplatrem]

No description provided.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling d870ce0 on leplatrem:support_exception_printlogger into d6dfd8f on hynek:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling d870ce0 on leplatrem:support_exception_printlogger into d6dfd8f on hynek:master.

[hynek]

Thanks!

1. every new test requires a doc string like https://plus.google.com/+JonathanLange/posts/YA3ThKWhSAj
2. I think we should somehow make sure, that no method is missing. How about using the keys of _NAME_TO_LEVEL sans notset?
3. Please use py.test’s parametrize instead of for loops: http://pytest.org/latest/parametrize.html It makes nicer error reports.
4. I forgot about the changelog again. Could you add an entry like “Better log.exception() within structlog.” and point it to both pull requests?

Thanks again!

[leplatrem]

I'll update the PR, no problem.

Updating the changelog in the PR does not make it easier for the maintainer (and the contributor!), since it will often trivial conflicts.

IHMO updating it in the merge commit is a better approach :)

[hynek]

speaking of which, could you rebase please :)

[leplatrem]

Done!

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling ad3973f on leplatrem:support_exception_printlogger into 0a90029 on hynek:master.

[hynek]

Thanks!