-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
Feature/sklearn v1.7 #138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/sklearn v1.7 #138
Conversation
fkiraly
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ouch! This looks absolutely painful!
We should test this - I think feature-engine tests 1.5, 1.6, and 1.7.
Could be a separate matrix to avoid proliferation of matrices, e.g., combinations of sklearn and python version, but only on one OS.
|
minor comment, I would give the test a name which includes matrix elements, so it appears like (3.10, macos-latest) in the other tests. Otherweise we have five jobs named test-sklearn-1.7 |
fkiraly
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
PR #138 added support for `scikit-learn 1.7.X`, but the bound in `pyproject.toml` was not raised - this PR increases that bound.
PR #138 added support for `scikit-learn 1.7.X`, but the bound in `pyproject.toml` was not raised - this PR increases that bound.
This PR fixes #128.
Compatibility functions for v1.6 and v1.7 of sklearn in hyperactive.integrations.sklearn._compat.py