Add types in all examples in docs. #4382
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
martinmr
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed 4 of 4 files at r1.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @danielmai and @MichaelJCompton)
danielmai
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2020
Sometimes users get confused by Dgraph's new behavior related to Types. And I often notice that the cause of this is other examples in the documentation that aren't exemplifying with types. So I had to add them to avoid future confusion like that. (cherry picked from commit e4229e6)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sometimes users get confused by Dgraph's new behavior related to Types. And I often notice that the cause of this is other examples in the documentation that aren't exemplifying with types. So I had to add them to avoid future confusion like that.
This change is