Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is normal data supposed to have non-zero attack values? #1

Open
rightx2 opened this issue May 14, 2020 · 7 comments
Open

Is normal data supposed to have non-zero attack values? #1

rightx2 opened this issue May 14, 2020 · 7 comments

Comments

@rightx2
Copy link

rightx2 commented May 14, 2020

Looks like all abnormal datasets have non-zero attack values in the period, but normal datasets don't.

  • "normal_20190911T200000_to_20190915T100000.csv": has all zero values
  • "normal_20191101T200000_to_20191104T150000.csv": has some non-zero values
attack       776
attack.P1    776
attack.P2      0
attack.P3      0
dtype: int64

I thought that the attack values made the data abnormal.. Did I miss something?

@wml20
Copy link
Contributor

wml20 commented May 20, 2020

You are right.
I checked the normal data and confirmed that SA2 (P1-PCPSP1PV1) attacks occurred periodically on November 2nd at 15:31 and November 3rd at 15:31.

This is caused by the operation of a part of the attack program during the normal data collection period.

We will update the normal data that deleted the attack part soon.

Thank you.

@mzietlow
Copy link

mzietlow commented Feb 3, 2021

Any updates on this?

Best wishes
~

@dolgam
Copy link
Contributor

dolgam commented Feb 9, 2021

We will upload the modified version of HAI 1.0 until 17th Feb. (--> It will be postponed to March. )
Sorry for the late update.
In addition, a new HAI dataset will be opened on the same day.

@mzietlow
Copy link

mzietlow commented Feb 10, 2021

Oh, the postponement is really unfortunate because I wanted to use the data in my thesis and need it by early March at the latest. Thank you for keeping us updated

@dolgam
Copy link
Contributor

dolgam commented Feb 14, 2021

I am sorry about the postponement due to our internal checking process.
We are trying to finish it early.

@yif0
Copy link

yif0 commented Mar 18, 2021

Any updates on this? Thanks for your effors!

@dolgam
Copy link
Contributor

dolgam commented Mar 19, 2021

We fixed a few bugs (not critical) of HAI 1.0 and made a new HAI dataset. After the internal process, we will upload them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants