Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use +jwt SSS? #14

Closed
thomas-fossati opened this issue Mar 7, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #15
Closed

use +jwt SSS? #14

thomas-fossati opened this issue Mar 7, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #15

Comments

@thomas-fossati
Copy link
Collaborator

IANA's Structured Syntax Suffixes registry has +jwt, defined in RFC8417 to be "used indicate that the media type is encoded as a JWT."

It looks like application/eat+jwt could be used instead of application/eat-jwt.

@thomas-fossati
Copy link
Collaborator Author

thomas-fossati commented Mar 7, 2023

Obviously, the next question is: should we register a +cwt SSS so we can do application/eat+cwt -- and also do the community a favour.

@laurencelundblade
Copy link
Collaborator

Looked at the various RFC involved and yes, this does seem like the right thing to do, both eat+jwt and eat+cwt. These would replace eat-jwt and eat-cwt.

Thx

@thomas-fossati
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Cool, will PR this asap.

thomas-fossati added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 9, 2023
Fix #14

Signed-off-by: Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@arm.com>
thomas-fossati added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2023
Fix #14

Signed-off-by: Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@arm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants