Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Explain why it makes sense to define an IETF extension to a scheme that is defined in an external body (ASTM). #2

Open
kc2rxo opened this issue Jun 14, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Explain why it makes sense to define an IETF extension to a scheme that is defined in an external body (ASTM). #2

kc2rxo opened this issue Jun 14, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@kc2rxo
Copy link
Contributor

@kc2rxo kc2rxo commented Jun 14, 2021

From Med
@kc2rxo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kc2rxo kc2rxo commented Jun 14, 2021

First pass at addressing in 0f4a464

@boucadair
Copy link

@boucadair boucadair commented Apr 20, 2022

0f4a464 is great. However, we don't include enough arguments why this couldn't be done directly in the ASTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@kc2rxo @boucadair