Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rotation of continuation access tokens #87

Closed
jricher opened this issue Nov 13, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Rotation of continuation access tokens #87

jricher opened this issue Nov 13, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@jricher
Copy link
Collaborator

jricher commented Nov 13, 2020

§5 Continuing a Grant Request: Editor's note:

If the continuation was previously bound to an access token, the new continue response MUST include a bound access token as well, and this token SHOULD be a new access token.

This used to be a MUST, but is it safe to back off that requirement?

@fimbault
Copy link
Collaborator

fimbault commented Dec 16, 2020

See also issue #147 (should we rotate them). The question is linked (MUST, SHOULD, or not required) but slightly different, as it is asking whether we could have race conditions if we allow the rotation.

@jricher
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jricher commented Oct 12, 2022

Token lifecycle is up to the AS. The client needs to be able to deal with a new continuation access token on every request if necessary, but there's not a compelling reason for the AS to always do this.

@jricher jricher closed this as completed Oct 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants