Welcome to the ImageJ 1.x patcher
What is it?
ij1-patcher injects extension points into ImageJ 1.x, i.e. code that
allows code outside of ImageJ 1.x to override some functions. For example, it is
possible to open a sophisticated, syntax-highlighting editor instead of the
default editor of ImageJ 1.x.
The patches optionally include (limited) support for so-called "headless" mode, i.e. running ImageJ 1.x without a graphical user environment. See below for details.
It also offers a convenient way to encapsulate multiple ImageJ 1.x "instances"
from each other (ImageJ 1.x relies heavily on static settings;
IJ.getInstance() is supposed to return the only ImageJ 1.x instance): a
LegacyEnvironment contains a completely insulated class loader that does not
interfere with ImageJ 1.x instances living in other class loaders. Example:
// The first parameter is a class loader, asking for a new, // special-purpose class loader to be created; the second parameter // asks for headless mode. LegacyEnvironment ij1 = new LegacyEnvironment(null, true); ij1.runMacro("print('Hello, world!');");
How can I use it?
<dependencies> ... <dependency> <groupId>net.imagej</groupId> <artifactId>ij1-patcher</artifactId> <version>0.1.0</version> </dependency> </dependencies>
Then, create a
// The first parameter is a class loader, asking for a new, // special-purpose class loader to be created; the second parameter // asks for headless mode. LegacyEnvironment ij1 = new LegacyEnvironment(null, true); ij1.runMacro("open('" + path + "');"); [... process the image ...] ij1.runMacro("saveAs('jpeg', '" + outputPath + "');");
Note: it is not currently possible to inject an
ImagePlus instance into the
legacy environment directly: There will be two different definitions of the
ImagePlus class involved -- the one from the calling class loader and the one
in the encapsulated class loader. It is impossible to assign an instance of one
to a variable of the other.
How does it work?
The runtime patches are applied through Javassist, a
library offering tools to manipulate Java bytecode. This is needed to get the
changes into ImageJ 1.x code. The runtime patches live in
LegacyHeadless (the latter being applied only when the
headless hacks are asked for).
To offer an encapsulated ImageJ 1.x instance, a new special-purpose class loader
(to be precise, a LegacyClassLoader) is created that contains only the patched
ImageJ 1.x classes, plus a select few classes required for callbacks. In
addition, it will share the very special
LegacyHooks class with the calling
class loader (i.e. this class will not be defined in the legacy class loader,
but its class definition as per the calling class loader will be reused).
The patched ImageJ 1.x classes interact with the "outside" world via the
LegacyHooks class, an abstract base class which gets called by the patched
ImageJ 1.x classes at appropriate times, e.g. when an exception needs to be
By default, the patched ImageJ 1.x will instantiate the
specialization of the
LegacyHooks and install these hooks into the
field that gets patched into the
ij.IJ class. That way, there is always an
instance, and the patched code does not check for
null first. The
EssentialLegacyHooks will also look for an initializer class -- to be loaded
in ImageJ 1.x'
PluginClassLoader -- and if one is found, instantiate and run
it as a
Runnable. By default, the initializer class is
net.imagej.legacy.plugin.LegacyInitializer -- to support ImageJ2 -- but it can
be overridden by setting the system property
ij1.patcher.initializer to the
class name to use instead.
To add new extensions, the
LegacyExtensions class should be extended by
- adding the necessary extension points at the end of the
LegacyHooksclass (with default implementations, for forward compatibility, so that users of
ij1-patcherare able to use subclasses of
LegacyHookswithout requiring changes after upgrading to a new
- adding a new method to the end that applies the necessary runtime patches,
- and calling that method in
LegacyHooks class definition needs to be shared with the calling class
loader, it must not use any ImageJ 1.x classes!
When configuring the
LegacyEnvironment -- e.g. disabling handling for the
ij1.plugin.dirs system property -- what really happens is that a
is added to the
LegacyInjector instance of the environment. This callback
will patch the constructor of the
EssentialLegacyHooks accordingly. As that
EssentialLegacyHooks class definition will be written out when using the
writeJar method, the configuration will be hard-coded into the written-out
.jar file, too.
For details about the headless mode, see the section below.
Where does it come from?
ImageJ 1.x is a very successful project that -- as any
major project -- benefits from some refactoring from time to time. A first
attempt at improving ImageJ 1.x was made in the
ImageJA project (which now serves as a
Mavenized version of ImageJ 1.x, automatically tracking ImageJ 1.x' releases).
Fiji, a related project aiming to provide a distribution of ImageJ, tapped into the ImageJA project to provide extension points not offered by ImageJ 1.x, and later also to provide the headless mode (see below). Over time, maintaining the ImageJA fork became very burdensome.
With ImageJ2, a major effort was started to
provide a new software architecture. The benefits to the Fiji project were
immediately obvious and over the course of time, Fiji first imitated ImageJ2's
approach by replacing the ImageJA-specific ImageJ 1.x patches with runtime
patches (see above). Later, the Fiji-specific patches moved from Fiji's
fiji-compat component into ImageJ's
In the last step, the runtime patching code in ImageJ was separated out from the
legacy service code, giving rise to this here
What is this "headless" mode about?
Traditionally, ImageJ 1.x was only ever intended to be a single application for
a single user on one single machine with one single task at each given moment.
That implementation detail shows through the way macros are recorded: in order
to make a plugin recordable, one has to instantiate a
GenericDialog and show
it to the user. When the same plugin is played back from a macro, the dialog's
values are populated from the macro options and the dialog is not displayed.
The problem is when the dialog cannot be instantiated because Java is running without a user interface. Which is quite common in today's clouds.
Originally devised in ImageJA (see above),
ij1-patcher's headless mode
provides limited support to run in a headless environment. It does so by
GenericDialog's superclass with a fake dialog class that does not
require a graphical user environment. This works with well-behaved plugins that
GenericDialog class in the intended way, but it breaks down when the
plugin tries to display GUI elements or assumes that the dialog itself is a
Summary: the headless mode works for most plugins but fails for plugins assuming that a graphical user environment is readily available.
Please see the ImageJ Wiki for more information.