Skip to content

Conversation

@elbeno
Copy link
Contributor

@elbeno elbeno commented Oct 29, 2025

Problem:

  • It is sometimes useful to rename a field in a message. Since fields are identified by name, this cannot be done with the existing extend mechanism.

Solution:

  • Introduce rename_field<Msg, OldName, NewName> for this purpose.

Problem:
- It is sometimes useful to rename a field in a message. Since fields are
  identified by name, this cannot be done with the existing `extend` mechanism.

Solution:
- Introduce `rename_field<Msg, OldName, NewName>` for this purpose.
@elbeno elbeno merged commit f701a01 into intel:main Oct 29, 2025
33 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants