Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 5, 2022. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@mythi
Copy link
Contributor

@mythi mythi commented Jun 27, 2017

No description provided.

pohly and others added 16 commits June 22, 2017 08:54
This targets developers and explains how layers meet the "Yocto
Compatible 2.0" criteria and provide optional functionality to other
distributions.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Krisztian Litkey <krisztian.litkey@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Krisztian Litkey <kli@iki.fi>
Added recipe for flatpak-utils. Currently it only contains flatpak-
session, our daemon to start up flatpak sessions, and the associated
systemd generator. Also declared flatpak-utils as a supported recipe.

Signed-off-by: Krisztian Litkey <krisztian.litkey@intel.com>
Added recipe for pre-declaring and populating the image with a set
of pre-declared flatpak remotes/repositories and their associated
flatpak-session users. These are then monitored for applications to
automatically pull in/update and start in flatpak-sessions.

Signed-off-by: Krisztian Litkey <krisztian.litkey@intel.com>
Added the necessary configuration bits for, and documented the whole
process of, adding pre-declared remotes/repositories.

Signed-off-by: Krisztian Litkey <krisztian.litkey@intel.com>
Added a flatpak-session packagegroup. It pulls in packagegroup-flatpak,
flatpak-utils (for flatpak-session), and flatpak-predefined-repos.

Signed-off-by: Krisztian Litkey <krisztian.litkey@intel.com>
Pull in packagegroup-flatpak-session if flatpak-session is among
DISTRO_FEATURES.

Signed-off-by: Krisztian Litkey <krisztian.litkey@intel.com>
…ons.

If included/required, enable flatpak-session in DISTRO_FEATURES and
also pull in basic flatpak support.

Signed-off-by: Krisztian Litkey <krisztian.litkey@intel.com>
…gment.

Added a commented out require for flatpak-session.inc and a comment
about its purpose.

Signed-off-by: Krisztian Litkey <krisztian.litkey@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Krisztian Litkey <krisztian.litkey@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Krisztian Litkey <krisztian.litkey@intel.com>
The "sensors" image feature includes mraa, upm and via their
dependencies also NodeJS. This is not required by all profiles
and having it in common has some downsides:
- slower build times in all tests using refkit-image-common
  (but not much, at least when NodeJS is already built,
  only 17s less when building twice, which takes several minutes)
- dependency on components which are not in OE-core and thus
  have a higher chance of breaking in other distros

Tests needs to be moved from common to gateway, too. While at it,
sorting order gets restored in the gateway test list.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
This has two advantages:
- slightly faster (but not much)
- less annoying when run on a developer desktop, because
  the graphical console window tends to pop up randomly
  during testing

Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
* meta-iot-web 1e515ff...775f6c2 (6):
  > Merge pull request intel#46 from nagineni/update_restserver
  > iot-rest-api-server.bb: Update iot-rest-api-server to v0.5.0
  > Merge pull request intel#45 from nagineni/node_gcc_7
  > nodejs: Fix Node.js build errors with gcc7
  > Merge pull request intel#43 from TizenTeam/sandbox/pcoval/on/master/latest
  > nodejs: Fix FTBFS by adding missing argument to d.getVar

Signed-off-by: Sudarsana Nagineni <sudarsana.nagineni@intel.com>
@refkit-ci
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@mythi mythi mentioned this pull request Jun 27, 2017
@mythi
Copy link
Contributor Author

mythi commented Jun 27, 2017

test this please

@mythi mythi merged commit 3dbebff into intel:master Jun 27, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants