Maybe rename gem to bibtex #64

Closed
minad opened this Issue Apr 7, 2013 · 2 comments

Projects

None yet

2 participants

@minad
minad commented Apr 7, 2013

The name bibtex is still unused on rubygems. I mean the ruby suffix is redundant, isn't it?

@inukshuk
Owner
inukshuk commented Apr 7, 2013

Good idea. What would you suggest for legacy support? Keeping bibtex-ruby as an empty gem that depends on bibtex but is still updated for each release? Or is there a better way to do this?

@minad
minad commented Apr 7, 2013

Yes, you should keep bibtex-ruby as an empty gem. This works well. You could add a post install message (see the gemspec documentation) which says "this gem has been replaced by bibtex".

@minad minad closed this Jan 28, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment