Fixes #1319: Status wrongly shows pins as REMOTE #1331
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The Allocations of a pin that has been added with default replication factor are kept even when the replication factor turns out to be -1. This resulted in the Status(cid) code skipping calls to a number of peers and setting the pin directly as REMOTE. The fix, on one side makes sure Allocations is always nil when the replication factor is -1. On the other size, lets the globalPinInfoCid method check the replication factor value, rather than the number of allocations to decide if any nodes are bound to be remote. On the plus side, the pin tracker used the IsRemotePin method, which uses the replication factor, so things were pinned even if the Status(cid) method shows them as remote.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
The Allocations of a pin that has been added with default replication factor
are kept even when the replication factor turns out to be -1.
This resulted in the Status(cid) code skipping calls to a number of peers
and setting the pin directly as REMOTE.
The fix, on one side makes sure Allocations is always nil when the replication
factor is -1. On the other size, lets the globalPinInfoCid method check the
replication factor value, rather than the number of allocations to decide if
any nodes are bound to be remote.
On the plus side, the pin tracker used the IsRemotePin method, which uses the
replication factor, so things were pinned even if the Status(cid) method shows
them as remote.
#1319