Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner. It is now read-only.

IPFS across temporary links #127

Closed
jantypas opened this issue May 29, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

IPFS across temporary links #127

jantypas opened this issue May 29, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@jantypas
Copy link

jantypas commented May 29, 2016

A question for the IPFS experts. I am looking at remote IPFS nodes. In some locations, we may have local "IPFS clusters" on Wifi, but the long-haul links are spotty. Consider the following usage case:

A local school district might have multiple IPFS nodes which communicate across local Wifi. Everything works just fine.
The school districts will connect twice a day on long-haul IP links. I am assuming during that connection, the IPFS nodes will synchronize

Can I do this?

@matthewrobertbell
Copy link

matthewrobertbell commented Jun 18, 2016

What do you mean by synchronize? As long as they know of each other and the links work, they can communicate and exchange data if someone requests it (or automatic DHT propagation).

@jantypas
Copy link
Author

jantypas commented Jun 19, 2016

I am thinking of the following scenario. This is a very rural school
in Africa. They may only have mobile connections to the net, say,
twice a day. Off-net, they'd be living off a cached-version of IPFS
until the twice-a-day synchronization.

------ Original Message ------
From: "mattseh" notifications@github.com
To: "ipfs/faq" faq@noreply.github.com
Cc: "John Antypas" ja@antypas.net; "Author"
author@noreply.github.com
Sent: 6/18/2016 9:01:15 AM
Subject: Re: [ipfs/faq] IPFS across temporary links (#127)

What do you mean by synchronize? As long as they know of each other and
the links work, they can communicate and exchange data if someone
requests it (or automatic DHT propagation).


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

@Kubuxu
Copy link

Kubuxu commented Jun 19, 2016

@jantypas it could work, you would just have to know sites you would like to synchronize.
Then as connection comes in, you would requires the m from IPFS network.
Also for now I would wait as we are still working on making IPFS less transfer hungry.

@jcalfee
Copy link

jcalfee commented Jun 20, 2016

Wouldn't you take all the hashes you wanted to sync and grab that file then PIN them in somewhere in the network that needed to download them?

@madavieb
Copy link

madavieb commented May 23, 2017

This issue has been moved to https://discuss.ipfs.io/t/ipfs-across-temporary-links/324.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants