Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner. It is now read-only.

Does IPFS (the protocol, not an implementation) have a license? #80

Closed
doesntgolf opened this issue Dec 11, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Does IPFS (the protocol, not an implementation) have a license? #80

doesntgolf opened this issue Dec 11, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@doesntgolf
Copy link

doesntgolf commented Dec 11, 2015

I'm not sure if it even makes sense for protocols to be licensed, so I'm trying to understand it better. (After a quick googling I haven't been able to determine if HTTP has a license, so I'm guessing it doesn't. The only writing about protocol licenses I could find is this blog post.)

@jbenet
Copy link
Contributor

jbenet commented Dec 11, 2015

good question. i was not familiar with the implications of licenses on the protocol itself. good link, thanks. i'll look into this in the coming weeks. likely will be licensed permissively, though i do want to run that question by people at the IETF and W3C.

@JesseWeinstein
Copy link

JesseWeinstein commented Jul 31, 2016

Any update on this?

@madavieb
Copy link

madavieb commented May 23, 2017

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants