New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
⚡️ v0.38.0 RELEASE 🚀
#2396
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@achingbrain can you include #2428 so that it unblocks all the work on improved testing #2276? |
|
I'd rather not because the build for that PR is failing, |
|
In all honesty stages 2 & 3 are likely to be very short as the early testers list is pretty short so we can always start the |
|
|
|
Also, the release is being done from a branch - |
|
A little late, but:
(running out of chicken emojis, sorry) |
|
This is planned to be the last rc before release and contains up to date documentation. |
|
@achingbrain does the number of unchecked boxes represent reality? |
|
More or less? It's up to date now. I left the stage headline checkbox unchecked if there were any steps missing so we have an easy view on what to improve next time. |

alanshaw commentedAug 27, 2019
•
edited by achingbrain
ipfs addoutput fixes[ ] feat: Config profiles(moved to v0.39.0)ipfs resolveFuture release:
feat: Enable DHT in client modefeat: Reproviderfeat: Repo migration toolfix: Locking for concurrent pin opsfix: Offline blockstore for pinningperf: Cache to improve pin performancefix: Limit concurrent HTTP requests in browser30th September
🙌🏽 Want to contribute?
Would you like to contribute to the IPFS project and don't know how? Well, there are a few places you can get started:
help wantedlabel in the js-ipfs repoThe best place to ask your questions about IPFS, how it works and what you can do with it is at discuss.ipfs.io. We are also available at the
#ipfschannel on Freenode.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: