New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adoptation of IPv6 from gPXE #6

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@ya-mouse
Copy link

ya-mouse commented Jun 24, 2012

This is the first patch to support auto configuration based on Router Advertisement packets received via ICMPv6. It required to extend "rx" methods with "netdev" structure to pass it deeper routines.

Anton D. Kachalov added some commits Jun 23, 2012

Anton D. Kachalov
[config] Add empty local sideband.h configuration file
Signed-off-by: Anton D. Kachalov <mouse@yandex-team.ru>
Anton D. Kachalov
[config] Remove sideband.h local config cause' it's automatically cre…
…ated by DEPs

Signed-off-by: Anton D. Kachalov <mouse@yandex-team.ru>
Anton D. Kachalov
[config] Include local configuration for sideband.h
Signed-off-by: Anton D. Kachalov <mouse@yandex-team.ru>
Anton D. Kachalov
[config] Enable IPv6 by default
Signed-off-by: Anton D. Kachalov <mouse@yandex-team.ru>
Anton D. Kachalov
[ipv6] Adopt IPv6 support from gPXE project made by Matthew Iselin <m…
…atthew@theiselins.net>

Signed-off-by: Anton D. Kachalov <mouse@yandex-team.ru>
@xbgmsharp

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

xbgmsharp commented Apr 8, 2013

Any chance to get this merge
IPv6 is a must have feature and was available in gPXE

@mcb30 mcb30 closed this May 17, 2014

@robinsmidsrod

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

robinsmidsrod commented May 18, 2014

For you guys finding this via some search engine; the reason it's closed is because another IPv6 implementation has been put in place. So if you're looking for IPv6 support in iPXE - it's already there. :)

@ya-mouse

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

ya-mouse commented May 18, 2014

Thanks. I keep track on it. IPv6 support has arrived in Dec'13 :)
If everything will be fine with Intel 10GbE in our env, then we would prepopuate iPXE over several thousand servers as an Option ROM ;)

@mcb30

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

mcb30 commented May 18, 2014

On 18/05/14 21:26, ya-mouse wrote:

Thanks. I keep track on it. IPv6 support has arrived in Dec'13 :)
If everything will be fine with Intel 10GbE in our env, then we would
prepopuate iPXE over several thousand servers as an Option ROM ;)

Is there something wrong with iPXE's support for Intel 10GbE?

Michael

@ya-mouse

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

ya-mouse commented May 19, 2014

iPXE looks fine. I'm not quiet sure about a flash rom size of 10GbE card (will it fit all our required feature set). Original PXE Option ROM takes less than 64k (bootutil -saveimage produces 64k dump).

cardoe added a commit to cardoe/ipxe that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2017

Merge branch 'dmi-support' into 'crucible'
DMI support

gathers the proper CPU data to fix ipxe#6 

See merge request !11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment