Update docs and examples for parallel stuff to reflect movement away from Twisted #326

Closed
ellisonbg opened this Issue Mar 31, 2011 · 7 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@ellisonbg
Member

ellisonbg commented Mar 31, 2011

In master, IPython.kernel has been removed in preparation for newparallel to be merged. However, the old docs and examples are stil in place. Once newparallel has been merged, we need to update the docs and examples and remove the Twisted ones.

@minrk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minrk

minrk Mar 31, 2011

Member

I started the newparallel docs and examples by copying and updating the ones for the kernel, so we already have strictly more documentation for the newparallel code than we ever did for IPython.kernel, and several of the examples.

Member

minrk commented Mar 31, 2011

I started the newparallel docs and examples by copying and updating the ones for the kernel, so we already have strictly more documentation for the newparallel code than we ever did for IPython.kernel, and several of the examples.

@ellisonbg

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ellisonbg

ellisonbg Mar 31, 2011

Member

Min, would you say we can remove the examples and docs for the old
Twisted stuff then? Or are there things you still want to move over.
I guess you can always co a previous version that has the old stuff.

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:42 PM, minrk
reply@reply.github.com
wrote:

I started the newparallel docs and examples by copying and updating the ones for the kernel, so we already have strictly more documentation for the newparallel code than we ever did for IPython.kernel, and several of the examples.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#326 (comment)

Brian E. Granger
Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo
bgranger@calpoly.edu and ellisonbg@gmail.com

Member

ellisonbg commented Mar 31, 2011

Min, would you say we can remove the examples and docs for the old
Twisted stuff then? Or are there things you still want to move over.
I guess you can always co a previous version that has the old stuff.

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:42 PM, minrk
reply@reply.github.com
wrote:

I started the newparallel docs and examples by copying and updating the ones for the kernel, so we already have strictly more documentation for the newparallel code than we ever did for IPython.kernel, and several of the examples.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#326 (comment)

Brian E. Granger
Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo
bgranger@calpoly.edu and ellisonbg@gmail.com

@minrk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minrk

minrk Mar 31, 2011

Member

I don't have 100% example coverage, but I think I do have 100% doc coverage, though the security doc is much less thorough, largely because we defer to SSH for security.

Member

minrk commented Mar 31, 2011

I don't have 100% example coverage, but I think I do have 100% doc coverage, though the security doc is much less thorough, largely because we defer to SSH for security.

@minrk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minrk

minrk Apr 8, 2011

Member

I just finished translating and removing the last of the kernel examples.

Member

minrk commented Apr 8, 2011

I just finished translating and removing the last of the kernel examples.

@ghost ghost assigned minrk Apr 10, 2011

@minrk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minrk

minrk Apr 11, 2011

Member

There's still doc work to do, but the docs and examples now are both strictly more than they were previously, so should I close this, or retitle it?

Main remaining work to do is in expanding the transition and details docs.

Member

minrk commented Apr 11, 2011

There's still doc work to do, but the docs and examples now are both strictly more than they were previously, so should I close this, or retitle it?

Main remaining work to do is in expanding the transition and details docs.

@ellisonbg

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ellisonbg

ellisonbg Apr 11, 2011

Member

If the current coverage is greater than before, let's close this.

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:03 PM, minrk
reply@reply.github.com
wrote:

There's still doc work to do, but the docs and examples now are both strictly more than they were previously, so should I close this, or retitle it?

Main remaining work to do is in expanding the transition and details docs.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#326 (comment)

Brian E. Granger
Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo
bgranger@calpoly.edu and ellisonbg@gmail.com

Member

ellisonbg commented Apr 11, 2011

If the current coverage is greater than before, let's close this.

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:03 PM, minrk
reply@reply.github.com
wrote:

There's still doc work to do, but the docs and examples now are both strictly more than they were previously, so should I close this, or retitle it?

Main remaining work to do is in expanding the transition and details docs.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#326 (comment)

Brian E. Granger
Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo
bgranger@calpoly.edu and ellisonbg@gmail.com

@minrk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minrk

minrk Apr 11, 2011

Member

Okay, closing then.

Member

minrk commented Apr 11, 2011

Okay, closing then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment