Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add shortcut to edit cell #9929

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 12, 2016
Merged

Conversation

takluyver
Copy link
Member

I've integrated some code @carlsmith posted on the mailing list to open the current cell in a text editor to edit a larger chunk of code. This reduces the need for %edit, and has the benefit that edited code goes into the IPython history.

What should the shortcut be? Carl used Ctrl-N, but nothing about that says 'edit' to me. I've gone for F2, which is used in Excel to edit the selected cell, and I've enabled it for both emacs and vi keybindings. If we don't use an F-key (or something funky like Insert), we probably need separate emacs and vi shortcuts.

@takluyver takluyver added this to the 5.2 milestone Sep 2, 2016
@Carreau
Copy link
Member

Carreau commented Sep 5, 2016

No objection for F2. Is this 5.2 material ?

@takluyver
Copy link
Member Author

It's a simple enough addition that I'd be inclined to backport it to 5.x.

@Carreau
Copy link
Member

Carreau commented Sep 12, 2016

It's a simple enough addition that I'd be inclined to backport it to 5.x.

Fair enough, let's add F2 for Py2.

@Carreau Carreau merged commit 4e52127 into ipython:master Sep 12, 2016
Carreau added a commit to Carreau/ipython that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2016
I've integrated some code _carlsmith posted on the mailing list to open the current cell in a text editor to edit a larger chunk of code. This reduces the need for `%edit`, and has the benefit that edited code goes into the IPython history.

What should the shortcut be? Carl used **Ctrl-N**, but nothing about that says 'edit' to me. I've gone for **F2**, which is used in Excel to edit the selected cell, and I've enabled it for both emacs and vi keybindings. If we don't use an F-key (or something funky like Insert), we probably need separate emacs and vi shortcuts.
@anntzer
Copy link
Contributor

anntzer commented Jan 31, 2017

Can vimmers also get "v" (in command mode) for this purpose? It is the equivalent shortcut in vi-mode for bash & friends.

@takluyver takluyver deleted the edit-cell-shortcut branch January 31, 2017 12:54
@takluyver
Copy link
Member Author

Sounds reasonable. Do you want to make a PR adding it? See IPython.terminal.shortcuts.

@carlsmith
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for adding this @takluyver.

P.S. I only went with n because I normally use ne (the Nice Editor).

@plumps
Copy link

plumps commented Feb 3, 2017

Funny, in my case, it doesn't seem to respect $EDITOR, while %edit does.

@Carreau
Copy link
Member

Carreau commented Feb 3, 2017

Funny, in my case, it doesn't seem to respect $EDITOR, while %edit does.

Strange. Try updating Prompttoolkit.
What version of IPython and PTK do you have ?

@plumps
Copy link

plumps commented Feb 3, 2017

IPython 5.2.2
prompt-toolkit 1.0.13

@plumps
Copy link

plumps commented Feb 3, 2017

Ah my EDITOR value of subl -w (which means sublime shall wait to return until files are closed) seams to be the culprit.

EDITOR=vim works though

@Carreau
Copy link
Member

Carreau commented Feb 4, 2017

Ah my EDITOR value of subl -w (which means sublime shall wait to return until files are closed) seams to be the culprit.

EDITOR=vim works though

Ha ! Need to be fixed in prompt_toolkit. As things get passed manually to subprocess.call it's trying to find the executable subl -w

As a workaround create a sublw file in your $PATH,make it executable and use it as your $EDITOR:

~/bin $ cat sublw
#!/bin/bash
subl -w $1
 ~/bin $ chmod u+x sublw

That should work.

Carreau added a commit to Carreau/python-prompt-toolkit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2017
On OSX, users will typically use `subl -w` to use sublime tet on
blocking mode, though this will be passed ass it to subprocess.call
leading to the `subl -w` command not found.

See ipython/ipython#9929

this should fix that. It would affect users with actual space on the
path of their editor executable, but I'm unsure how to handle both case.
It seem to me like passing flags would be the most common use case.

Workaround is to tell users to create an shim executable which pass the
options.
@Carreau
Copy link
Member

Carreau commented Feb 4, 2017

I've submitted a patch to prompt toolkit.

@plumps
Copy link

plumps commented Feb 4, 2017

I'll wait for the patched prompt-toolkit

jonathanslenders pushed a commit to prompt-toolkit/python-prompt-toolkit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2017
On OSX, users will typically use `subl -w` to use sublime tet on
blocking mode, though this will be passed ass it to subprocess.call
leading to the `subl -w` command not found.

See ipython/ipython#9929

this should fix that. It would affect users with actual space on the
path of their editor executable, but I'm unsure how to handle both case.
It seem to me like passing flags would be the most common use case.

Workaround is to tell users to create an shim executable which pass the
options.
meeseeksdev bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants