The repository contains MIT license text, but package.json says '"license": "BSD"'. Could someone please clarify whether project is under MIT or BSD?
I am currently packaging Etherpad Lite for Debian. This project is on the dependency list. As we in Debian are very serious about licensing, I am also a little concerned about the ambiguity described above.
Please fix either the LICENSE file or the license name (BSD -> MIT) in the package.json file.
Mike (aka email@example.com)