Please clarify licensing #17

Closed
msrb opened this Issue May 21, 2013 · 1 comment

Projects

None yet

2 participants

@msrb
msrb commented May 21, 2013

The repository contains MIT license text, but package.json says '"license": "BSD"'. Could someone please clarify whether project is under MIT or BSD?

Thanks

@sunweaver

Hi,

I am currently packaging Etherpad Lite for Debian. This project is on the dependency list. As we in Debian are very serious about licensing, I am also a little concerned about the ambiguity described above.

Please fix either the LICENSE file or the license name (BSD -> MIT) in the package.json file.

Thanks,
Mike (aka sunweaver@debian.org)

@isaacs isaacs added a commit that closed this issue May 27, 2013
@isaacs bsd license
Closes #17
0f6b909
@isaacs isaacs closed this in 0f6b909 May 27, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment