Skip to content

Copying between servers #11971

Description

@cyberduck

35eaba7 created the issue

I think it would be both cool and useful, if the user could drag between FTP windows, each connected to different servers. I would imagine that the file would be downloaded to a temp DIR then uploaded again, but what would i know.

Activity

  1. cyberduck commented on May 15, 2006

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    @dkocher commented

    FXP might also be of interest.

  2. cyberduck commented on May 27, 2006

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    @dkocher commented

    Milestone 2.7 deleted

  3. cyberduck commented on Aug 9, 2006

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    anonymous commented

    Yes, FXP support would be highly appreciated!

  4. cyberduck commented on Oct 15, 2006

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    296e015 commented

    working fxp will be nice

  5. cyberduck commented on Jan 20, 2007

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    endlessfight commented

    I would absolutely LOVE to see this implemented.

    I'm not sure what underlying FTP interface Cyberduck is using, but LFTP (available through DarwinPorts, or the official site here: http://lftp.yar.ru/) supports FXP as well as TLS/SSL so perhaps it could be used and/or modified to fit the job.

  6. cyberduck commented on Feb 10, 2008

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    2c2d911 commented

    I just want to add support for this feature. Its really quite important for me.

  7. cyberduck commented on Feb 23, 2008

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    anonymous commented

    Replying to [comment:13 zacwitte]:

    I just want to add support for this feature. Its really quite important for me.

    me too

  8. cyberduck commented on Nov 26, 2008

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    technimad commented

    This feature would really help me.
    Real FXP (direct server to server copy) isn't necesarry, working with a local temp dir to automatically download from server 1 and upload to server 2 would be ok!

  9. cyberduck commented on Apr 13, 2009

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    @dkocher commented

    Milestone 3.2 deleted

  10. cyberduck commented on Sep 9, 2009

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    spamalot commented

    I've been waiting for this feature for years. I sure hope it gets done someday.

  11. cyberduck commented on Oct 13, 2009

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    34915eb commented

    any news on this feature?

  12. cyberduck commented on Jan 6, 2010

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    @dkocher commented

    #4058 closed as duplicate.

  13. cyberduck commented on Jan 6, 2010

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    @dkocher commented

    #4059 closed as duplicate.

  14. cyberduck commented on Jan 11, 2010

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    mini commented

    While FXP certainly will be an useful feature, I (and several others it appears from the ticket) would like it to support drag 'n' drop between servers of different kinds (more generally than FXP), e.g. between SFTP and S3. Doing it by using a temporary directory would be fine, I primary just want to minimize the work done in order to copy/move files between servers.

  15. cyberduck commented on Feb 5, 2010

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    @ylangisc commented

    #4183 closed as duplicate

  16. cyberduck commented on Apr 5, 2010

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    stefan AT blrp DOT org commented

    Do we have any estimated delivery date on this?
    Thanks!

  17. cyberduck commented on Apr 9, 2010

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    @ylangisc commented

    #4368 closed as duplicate.

  18. cyberduck commented on Apr 12, 2010

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    @ylangisc commented

    #4391 closed as duplicate.

  19. cyberduck commented on Apr 25, 2010

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    Timidfriendly commented

    Yeah this is something very useful!

  20. cyberduck commented on Jul 27, 2010

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    @dkocher commented

    We are no more looking into FXP but copying support between browser windows regardless of the protocol.

  21. cyberduck commented on Aug 30, 2010

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    f470a15 commented

    I concur with the technology not being an issue. The copying between browser windows is a feature really important to me though. Do you have a projected date for availability?

  22. cyberduck commented on Sep 18, 2010

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    @dkocher commented

    Some work in 55c03ec.

  23. cyberduck commented on Oct 5, 2010

    @cyberduck
    ContributorAuthor

    @dkocher commented

    In b151107.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions