Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integration with the Box.net API #5166

Closed
cyberduck opened this issue Sep 8, 2010 · 3 comments
Closed

Integration with the Box.net API #5166

cyberduck opened this issue Sep 8, 2010 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement webdav WebDAV Protocol Implementation wontfix

Comments

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator

cyberduck commented Sep 8, 2010

boxalex created the issue

I work with the platform at Box.net (if you'd like to contact me directly, my name is Alex Willen, and my email is awillen at box dot net), and I was glad to notice a couple of people on here successfully using Cyberduck with Box via WebDAV. I wanted to suggest that you consider integrating Box into Cyberduck via our API - our focus is on support that, rather than WebDAV, as it is more robust and useful for developers. Documentation can be found at developers.box.net, with helpful code samples at developers.box.net/ApiExamples.

Alternatively, I would suggest a preconfigured Box.net WebDAV option, as some potential less-technical users may not be aware that you can use Cyberduck with Box using that method.

Thanks for your time and for a great product!

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cyberduck commented Sep 9, 2010

@dkocher commented

I have added configuration instructions to the wiki.

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cyberduck commented Sep 9, 2010

@dkocher commented

It would possibly help if you can also adjust your support pages.

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cyberduck commented Sep 9, 2010

@dkocher commented

Replying to [5166 boxalex]:

I work with the platform at Box.net (if you'd like to contact me directly, my name is Alex Willen, and my email is awillen at box dot net), and I was glad to notice a couple of people on here successfully using Cyberduck with Box via WebDAV. I wanted to suggest that you consider integrating Box into Cyberduck via our API - our focus is on support that, rather than WebDAV, as it is more robust and useful for developers. Documentation can be found at developers.box.net, with helpful code samples at developers.box.net/ApiExamples.

Alternatively, I would suggest a preconfigured Box.net WebDAV option, as some potential less-technical users may not be aware that you can use Cyberduck with Box using that method.

Thanks for your time and for a great product!

Will have a look at the API if that would make sense.

@iterate-ch iterate-ch locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 26, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement webdav WebDAV Protocol Implementation wontfix
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants