Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

“Server” field is meaningless for S3; should be hidden #5279

Closed
cyberduck opened this issue Oct 4, 2010 · 2 comments
Closed

“Server” field is meaningless for S3; should be hidden #5279

cyberduck opened this issue Oct 4, 2010 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator

cyberduck commented Oct 4, 2010

ba57b2b created the issue

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Go to the bookmarks tab.
  2. Click the “+” sign to add a bookmark.
  3. Choose “S3 (Amazon Simple Storage Service)” from the drop-down list.

Results:

One of the fields shown is “Server:” and it is empty, as though the user needs to type something in there.

Notes:

This is confusing as many users won’t know what to enter there. In fact, the field can be left blank. Ideally it should be disabled, removed from the form, or at least pre-filled when the user is setting up an Amazon S3 bookmark.


Attachments

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cyberduck commented Oct 4, 2010

@dkocher commented

It should be prefilled. We do support editing because of thidparty S3 providers such as Dunkel Cloud Storage.

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cyberduck commented Oct 6, 2010

@dkocher commented

In ecc9aa4.

@iterate-ch iterate-ch locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 26, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants