-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 301
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for Multipart Uploads #5487
Comments
In addition this would allow to support the new 5 TB Object Size Limit. |
I have tried several times but am unable to upload a 16GB file to Amazon S3 Singapore. Any ideas? The upload seems to run to the end, but then I get an Upload Failed error. Thanks. -Mark |
Replying to [comment:6 stickenhoffen]:
Are you running the latest snapshot build? Please post the HTTP transcript from the log drawer in the Transfers window. |
Hi, yes I am using the very latest snapshot. Can I email the log to you rather than have it archived here? Thanks so much. -Mark |
Replying to [comment:8 stickenhoffen]:
Sure, [mailto:feedback@cyberduck.ch]. |
S3 is returning a Have to do some more testing with this. Analyzing is a pain because the log is mangled with concurrent requests, though. |
Replying to [comment:10 dkocher]:
There is possibly nothing we can do about these failures but to support resuming parts of the transfer that failed. |
We have prepared but not yet enabled support for resuming parts of a multipart upload in 346e367. The problem is that failed uploads take up space and must be explicitly cancelled if the transfer should be aborted altogether. Currently we do this for every incomplete upload. If resuming should be possible we obviously can't do this but need an option for the user to cancel later instead of resuming. |
S3 recently added a new feature: multi-part uploads.
The benefits of using this feature with Cyberduck include:
This added functionality comes almost for free in the AWS SDK for Java mentioned in ticket #5486, so it is probably useful to consider this as blocked on that ticket.
I am also willing to contribute code for this feature. In all honesty it should be nearly trivial once #5486 is resolved.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: