Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The Encryption request you specified is not valid. Supported value: AES256. #6365

Closed
cyberduck opened this issue Nov 14, 2011 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator

@cyberduck cyberduck commented Nov 14, 2011

38a28fd created the issue

Hi!

Official v4.1.3.9045 version is works correctly.

But with this snapshot build (downloaded with built in updater): v4.1.4 9177, if I upload any file to Amazon S3, I get error message: "The Encryption request you specified is not valid. Supported value: AES256."

And my suggest: Good idea, if Amazon S3 server side encryption selectable in options (preferences/S3)

Log:

GET /?delimiter=%2F&max-keys=1000&prefix HTTP/1.1
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:34:10 GMT
Authorization: ***
Host: my.test.eu.s3.amazonaws.com:443
Connection: Keep-Alive
User-Agent: Cyberduck/4.1.4 (9177) (Windows 7/6.1) (x86)
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
x-amz-id-2: ***
x-amz-request-id: ***
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:34:11 GMT
Content-Type: application/xml
Transfer-Encoding: chunked

Thanks.

@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@cyberduck cyberduck commented Nov 14, 2011

@dkocher commented

In fba8a9d.

Loading

@cyberduck cyberduck closed this Nov 14, 2011
@cyberduck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@cyberduck cyberduck commented Nov 16, 2011

38a28fd commented

Replying to [comment:2 dkocher]:

In fba8a9d.

I see 9241 version, this is works, problem is solved, thank you.

Loading

@iterate-ch iterate-ch locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 26, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants