A tiny test repository to exercise different methods to detect incorrectly written Clojure unit tests.
To run the unit test in test/catchme/core_test.clj from the shell
using Leiningen:
$ lein test
To run the unit tests with multiple versions of Clojure that have been
specified as profiles in project.clj, and listed in the test-all
alias defined there:
$ lein test-all
To run the Eastwood linter:
$ lein eastwood
Below are the results I get when trying these commands on my system, a MacBook Pro running macOS 10.12.6 with these versions of the JVM and Leiningen installed:
$ java -version
java version "1.8.0_181"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_181-b13)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.181-b13, mixed mode)
$ lein version
Leiningen 2.8.1 on Java 1.8.0_181 Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
The results show no errors caught when running lein test with any of
Clojure 1.9.0, 1.10.0-alpha6, or 1.10.0-alpha7. Eastwood 0.2.8 does
catch it, as it has caught similar problems for several versions
before that, too.
$ lein test
lein test catchme.core-test
Running deftest b-test with Clojure 1.10.0-alpha7
Ran 1 tests containing 1 assertions.
0 failures, 0 errors.
$ lein test-all
Performing task 'test' with profile(s): 'test,1.9,dev'
lein test catchme.core-test
Running deftest b-test with Clojure 1.9.0
Ran 1 tests containing 1 assertions.
0 failures, 0 errors.
Performing task 'test' with profile(s): 'test,1.10a6,dev'
lein test catchme.core-test
Running deftest b-test with Clojure 1.10.0-alpha6
Ran 1 tests containing 1 assertions.
0 failures, 0 errors.
Performing task 'test' with profile(s): 'test,1.10a7,dev'
lein test catchme.core-test
Running deftest b-test with Clojure 1.10.0-alpha7
Ran 1 tests containing 1 assertions.
0 failures, 0 errors.
$ lein eastwood
== Eastwood 0.2.8 Clojure 1.10.0-alpha7 JVM 1.8.0_181
Directories scanned for source files:
src test
== Linting catchme.core ==
== Linting catchme.core-test ==
Entering directory `/Users/jafinger/clj/catch-bad-unit-test'
test/catchme/core_test.clj:7:7: suspicious-expression: = called with 1 args. (= x) always returns true. Perhaps there are misplaced parentheses?
== Warnings: 1 (not including reflection warnings) Exceptions thrown: 0
Subprocess failed
Copyright © 2018 Andy Fingerhut
Distributed under the Eclipse Public License either version 1.0 or (at your option) any later version.